Wednesday, May 18, 2011

L'accusatrice de DSK prête à témoigner














 



Stéphane Jourdain
Agence France-Presse
New York
La victime présumée de Dominique Strauss-Kahn, une jeune guinéenne musulmane, femme de chambre et mère célibataire, est prête à venir témoigner devant les tribunaux face au patron du FMI, l'un des hommes les plus influents de la planète jusqu'à il y a quelques jours.
La femme de 32 ans qui accuse DSK de l'avoir agressée sexuellement samedi dans une suite de l'hôtel Sofitel élève seule sa fille de 15 ans dans un appartement d'un immeuble du Bronx, l'immense quartier populaire du nord de New York.
L'édifice, devant lequel les journalistes défilent depuis trois jours, est un bâtiment sans charme d'une soixantaine d'appartements, en briques rouges typiques de New York, avec des escaliers en fer noir zigzaguant sur sa façade.
Selon son avocat Jeff Shapiro, la femme est prête à témoigner. À affronter les journalistes, le public, la pression. Et le patron du FMI, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, un ami de Bill Clinton, un ancien ministre des Finances en France que les sondages voyaient remporter la présidentielle à venir, qui figurait en 2010 dans la liste des 100 personnalités les plus influentes du magazine américain Time.
«Elle est prête à faire tout ce qu'on lui demandera de faire et à coopérer avec la police ou le ministère public», a dit Me Shapiro.
«Elle n'a aucune idée derrière la tête. Elle fait ça parce qu'elle pense qu'il faut le faire et elle va le faire», a-t-il déclaré sur la chaîne de télévision NBC, rejetant, tout comme le frère de l'accusatrice, toute «théorie du complot».
La jeune femme a témoigné mercredi devant la chambre d'accusation (grand jury) chargé de décider si Dominique Strauss-Kahn doit être inculpé, a annoncé son avocat plus tard sur CNN.
Les jurés auront découvert une grande -elle mesure près de 1,80 mètre- et belle femme, selon le concierge de son immeuble et son frère, qui a quitté la Guinée pour venir travailler aux États-Unis.
«Elle est arrivée» aux États-Unis «dans des circonstances difficiles, pour trouver l'asile et avoir une meilleure vie pour elle et pour sa fille. Elle a appris son métier, elle était enchantée d'avoir son emploi», a indiqué Me Shapiro sur NBC.
Selon le site Slate, elle est la fille d'un commerçant appartenant à l'ethnie peule (40% de la population de Guinée, pays de 10 millions d'habitants). Elle habiterait aux États-Unis depuis 13 ans et serait détentrice d'une carte verte, ce qui lui donnerait le droit de travailler.
«C'est une bonne musulmane. Elle ne porte pas le voile mais elle se couvre les cheveux», a dit le frère de la victime à l'AFP. Contrairement à son frère, elle n'a pas vécu en France mais parle français parfaitement.
«Je la connais depuis qu'elle a emménagé ici il y a environ six mois», a expliqué à l'AFP le concierge de son immeuble. «C'est une fille sympa, qui travaille dur, je la voyais quasiment tous les jours quand elle partait au travail», raconte-t-il.
L'employeur de la jeune femme, le Sofitel, a indiqué cette semaine qu'elle travaillait depuis trois ans dans ce grand hôtel du centre de Manhattan et qu'elle donnait «entière satisfaction tant en ce qui concerne la qualité de son travail que de son comportement».
La législation américaine interdit de donner l'identité de la victime présumée.

New Tory cabinet is larger, more diverse









 
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper's new cabinet is not only his largest but also his most diverse, with ministers plucked from every part of the country chosen to represent their region and also their ethnicity, religion and gender.

Among the 38 ministers unveiled Wednesday morning during a ceremony at Rideau Hall, there were nine new faces, a pair of snubs and several big promotions, particularly for MPs from Quebec.

Harper told reporters there were many worthy candidates, some left on the sidelines, but he believes he picked the right mix of experience and new blood.

"Any hockey coach would tell you that if a team is going to keep winning over time it must maintain a core of veterans and then gradually blend in new talent," he said. "We have many new members of Parliament who are very promising," Harper added. "(But) I didn't want to make too many additional changes unless I had to."

Among Harper's newest talents are:

- Joe Oliver, a bilingual Jewish investment dealer who defeated a longtime Liberal to win in Toronto, who will now head up the department of natural resources;

- Peter Penashue, the first Innu member ever elected to Parliament — and the second aboriginal appointed to cabinet after Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq — and the party's only MP in Newfoundland and Labrador, as minister for intergovernmental affairs;

- Bal Gosal, a commercial insurance broker who immigrated to Canada from India and defeated a Liberal in a Brampton, Ont., as minister of state for sport;

- And Bernard Valcourt, a former Brian Mulroney-era cabinet minister and lawyer in New Brunswick, appointed minister of state for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency and La Francophonie.

A few familiar faces are now in cabinet, or back in cabinet, as is the case for former Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier, who famously forgot confidential documents at his girlfriend's house in 2008, prompting his ouster from cabinet.

Bernier, who arrived solo and in a taxicab, takes on a junior position as minister of state for small business and tourism.

Quebec MP Steven Blaney, a Tory backbencher since 2006 and often tasked as the francophone spokesman during government announcements, was given the job of veterans affairs minister.

Ed Fast, another Conservative backbencher from Abbotsford, B.C., where the province lost three top cabinet ministers, was rewarded with the plum position of international trade and minister responsible for the Asia-Pacific Gateway.

Alice Wong, an educator from Richmond, B.C., and Hong Kong immigrant, was the only new female appointed to cabinet. She was elevated from parliamentary secretary for multiculturalism to minister of state for seniors.

And Tim Uppal, a Sikh MP from Edmonton since 2008, was appointed minister of state for democratic reform — a task possibly made more difficult with the surprise announcement that three just-defeated Conservative candidates would be appointed to the Senate, two of them as re-appointments.

Among the three other Conservatives elected in Quebec, the two already in cabinet — Christian Paradis and Denis Lebel — received big promotions. Paradis became industry minister while Lebel was vaulted to transport while retaining the responsibility for Quebec's economic development agency.

Two previous junior ministers, Rob Merrifield and Rob Moore, were both dropped from cabinet.

Most of the party's veteran ministers stayed put, though Tony Clement moved from industry to Treasury Board — where he will watch over potentially massive spending cuts — and former House leader John Baird was rewarded with a promotion to foreign affairs.

NDP leader Jack Layton said it was disappointing that despite the stronger female representation in the House of Commons, the prime minister's inner circle was still surrounded by testosterone. The number of women in cabinet remained at 10.

"It's disappointing that . . . Mr. Harper has decided to award most of his cabinet, once again, to men," he told reporters. "While it's a new cabinet, there are a lot of the same players there that steered the last government through contempt and scandals."

Peter Van Loan, former international trade minister, was re-appointed as House leader, a position that he denied was a demotion.

"I think it will be a fun job," he told reporters who surrounded him as he exited the Governor General's home.

Former Ontario top cop Julian Fantino, the former junior minister for seniors was promoted to junior minister for national defence — a title, however, he seemed to disagree with.

"You're the associate minister, therefore you're not the senior minister, right?" a reporter asked, after Fantino denied the junior status.

"I don't know, I'm not going to quibble over that. I'm just here to lend a helping hand," he replied.

National Defence Minister Peter MacKay remains in place, as does Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, Heritage Minister James Moore, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, Justice Minister Rob Nicholson and Finance Minister Jim Flaherty.

Flaherty told reporters he would bring in the budget sometime in June and hinted a revamped version of his March 22 budget might include the controversial end to the per-vote political party subsidy, but perhaps not the $2.2 billion in compensation to Quebec for harmonizing the provincial and federal sales tax.

"There are some election commitments that will be incorporated in the amended budget," he said, adding that the fiscal document wouldn't be much different than what was presented before the election.

Harper told reporters that despite his government's focus on cutting federal spending he did not contemplate cutting cabinet's size — which grew by one position — because he wanted to make full use of all the people in front of him.

"The question here is not one of cost; the question is making sure we have a ministry that is broad, representative of the country, tries to use people's talents to the maximum," Harper said.

"I think it would be a mistake to try and have a smaller cabinet that would make less use of people, but . . . we try and deal with the cost issues by slimming the budgets of the ministers' offices and we will continue to do that."

Harper's 26 full-portfolio ministers are paid $233,247 and the 11 ministers of state receive a salary of $214,368.

With files from Carmen Chai, Tobi Cohen and Amy Minsky

Twitter.com/althiaraj


Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/decision-canada/Tory+cabinet+larger+more+diverse/4805951/story.html#ixzz1MlAejqV9

Monday, May 16, 2011

Femme noire! Femme afrO-AMERicaine! OH! TU ES BELLE...TU NE VEUX PAS DE MON ARGENT!








DSK et le mystère de la femme noire
Le patron du FMI dans une mauvaise passe


Dominique Strauss-Khan se serait-il laissé envoûter par les charmes d’une femme de chambre noire de l’hôtel new-yorkais Sofitel, au péril de sa carrière politique ? Le patron du Fonds monétaire international (FMI) et favori de la présidentielle française de 2012 a été inculpé dimanche, aux Etats-Unis, pour agression sexuelle, tentative de viol et séquestration sur Ophélia, pseudonyme de la mystérieuse victime.
C’est couverte d’un drap blanc que la plaignante est sortie, dimanche, du commissariat de Harlem, à New York, après avoir formellement identifié Dominique Strauss-Khan comme son agresseur. L’identité de la femme de ménage qui compromet sérieusement l’avenir de l’homme politique français fait l’objet de nombreuses spéculations. Seule certitude, elle a 32 ans et la peau basanée. L’employée serait portoricaine ou afro-américaine, selon des rumeurs non confirmées. Certains avancent des pays comme la Guinée, le Sénégal, ou le Ghana. Le New York Times relate qu’elle vivrait depuis peu dans le Bronx avec sa fille adolescente, selon les dires d’un gestionnaire d’immeuble où elle aurait emménagé il y a quelques mois. La victime présumée serait mariée avec au moins un enfant d’après le New-York Post . Deux enfants plus, si l’on se fie au Wall Street Journal. Jorge Tito, le directeur de Sofitel a quant à lui reconnu les qualités professionnelles et personnelles de son employée. Dans un communiqué, il déclare que : « Nous tenons à préciser que notre employée travaille au Sofitel NY depuis 3 ans et donne entière satisfaction tant en ce qui concerne la qualité de son travail que de son comportement ». De quoi ébranler en partie la théorie du complot qui circule depuis l’annonce de l’arrestation du présidentiable français.
De précédentes affaires de mœurs
Le directeur général du FMI n’en est pas à sa première affaire de mœurs. La carrière de DSK a déjà été menacée en octobre 2008 suite à la révélation de la liaison qu’il a entretenue avec l’une de ses subordonnées, Piroska Nagy, une économiste d’origine hongroise alors en poste au département Afrique de l’institution monétaire. Soupçonné d’abus de pouvoir, il avait alors été blanchi au motif que la relation était consentie par les deux parties. L’homme, interrogé sur son fort penchant pour le sexe faible le 28 avril dernier à Paris par le journal Libération, répondait : « Oui, j’aime les femmes… et alors ? »
Plus gênant pour le ténor du PS sont les propos tenus en 2007 par la journaliste et romancière Tristane Banon sur le plateau de « 93 Faubourg Saint Honoré », une émission de la chaîne Paris première et animée par Thierry Ardisson. L’écrivaine y affirmait avoir été victime d’une tentative de viol en 2002 de la part de DSK- dont le nom est bipé - qu’elle qualifie de « chimpanzé en rut ». « Il a dégrafé mon soutien gorge, il a essayé d’ouvrir mon jean », raconte Tristane Banon. A l’époque dissuadée de porter plainte par sa mère, Anne Mansouret, conseillère générale et régionale PS de Normandie, elle envisage aujourd’hui de le faire.
Une enquête en route
La défense s’organise autour de DSK. Ses avocats affirment que le directeur du FMI aurait quitté l’Hôtel à midi, soit une heure avant les faits qui lui sont reprochés indique RMC. Il aurait par la suite rejoint sa fille pour déjeuner dans un restaurant new-yorkais avant de prendre la direction de l’aéroport JFK. Or Paul J. Browne, commissaire adjoint et porte-parole de la police de New York, déclare que les évènements se sont déroulés plus tôt que l’heure annoncée initialement : « Nous avions dit initialement que c’était aux alentours de 13 heures, en fait c’était plus proche de midi ». DSK aurait quitté l’hôtel vers 12H28.
A la demande des autorités new-yorkaise, Dominique Strauss-Khan s’est soumis à des analyses scientifiques et médico-légales. Les examens permettront d’étayer ou de réfuter les accusations portées par l’accusée. Atlantico.fr a retransmis les extraits d’un rapport qui affirme que les autorités newyorkaises ont constaté des marques de griffures sur le torse de l’inculpé et « des traces ADN vraisemblablement de sperme », font actuellement l’objet d’analyse.
Le directeur général du FMI aurait, samedi, à la sortie de son bain, alors qu’il était nu, tenté d’agresser sexuellement une femme de chambre qui venait faire le lit de la suite 2806. Facebook Twitter Envoyer Benjamin Brafman, l’avocat de Dominique Strauss-Kahn, avait offert une caution d’un million de dollars pour obtenir la mise en liberté provisoire de DSK, qui aurait également remis son passeport à la justice.
Benjamin Brafman, l’avocat de Dominique Strauss-Kahn, avait offert une caution d’un million de dollars pour obtenir la mise en liberté provisoire de DSK, qui aurait également remis son passeport à la justice. Ce lundi, à New York, la juge Melissa Jackson a refusé sa libération sous caution, justifiant d’un risque de fuite, et ordonné son incarcération. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, qui sept chefs d’accusation, risque soixante-quatorze ans et trois mois de prison.
Le procès-verbal de la plainte, énoncé au cours de l’audience et publié sur ABC News, indique que les enquêteurs ont été informés par la victime, « que l’accusé a fermé la porte et empêché cette personne de quitter la pièce, touché les seins de la plaignante sans son consentement, tenté de retirer de force les bas de cette personne et lui a touché la zone du vagin de force, forcé la bouche de la plaignante à toucher son pénis à deux reprises, n’a pu commettre ces actes qu’en utilisant sa force ».



Etats-Unis



réactions

HONTE AUX GOUVERNEMENTS QUI INQUIETENT LES CHEVALIERS DE LA PLUME!








Burundi : le journaliste Jean-Claude Kavumbagu pourrait être libéré


La libération du journaliste burundais Jean-Claude Kavumbagu, directeur du journal en ligne Net Press, est attendue ce lundi, rapporte VOAnews. Il avait été interpellé le 17 juillet dernier, quelques jours après la publication de son article intitulé, "Le Burundi sera-t-il la prochaine cible des Chebabs somaliens ?". "Le tribunal de Grande instance a acquitté Jean-Claude Kavumbagu pour les crimes très graves de trahison, d’imputation dommageable et d’injures dont il était accusé, et l’a condamné à huit mois de prison et 100 000 francs burundais (80 USD) pour un délit de presse", a déclaré Gabriel Sinarinzi, son avocat. Il devrait donc sortir de prison "incessamment" a-t-il ajouté.

Une bonne réforme électorale au Canada








La Presse Canadienne



Des manifestations pour une réforme électorale au Canada se déroulent samedi dans une dizaine de villes, dont Montréal, Toronto et Vancouver.
Cette initiative citoyenne veut faire pression sur le gouvernement pour obtenir un système électoral plus représentatif, tout en sensibilisant la population en général.
L'un des organisateurs, Joel Pedneault, explique que les dernières élections fédérales ont démontré que le système actuel est injuste. Il souhaite la mise en place éventuelle d'un système électoral proportionnel, dans lequel chaque vote pourrait compter.
M. Pedneault souligne que le Bloc québécois et le Parti libéral, qui ont fait élire peu de députés, auraient été mieux représentés dans un système proportionnel, le Bloc ayant notamment obtenu le quart des votes au Québec.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Will a majority mean a more open government?



There has been much speculation and angst about what direction a Stephen Harper majority government might take.

Perhaps anticipating the question, he addressed the matter during this victory speech by indicating that people "don't like surprises," which may mean doing what he said he would do: balancing the books a year sooner than expected; passing the budget that was put on hold by the election; introducing an anti-crime package; changing the way parties are financed; and perhaps reforming the Senate.

I'd like to suggest one more item for his menu: opening up government by empowering bureaucrats to release more information, and making that task even easier by reforming the Access to Information Act.

The Conservatives rode to power in 2006 promising more openness in the wake of the Liberal sponsorship scandal. But something happened along the way. Stephen Harper's government found itself fending off accusations that it had become secretive, despite the legitimate argument that it had made more federal institutions, including the CBC and Canada Post, subject to the Act. Perhaps the precariousness of successive minority governments was to blame, or maybe it was the realization that it's safer to hold on to information than release it.

Whatever the reason, an argument can be made that now might be an ideal time for Harper to actually enhance the very open government initiative that his administration unveiled just before the election. In other words, elevate the concept of open government way beyond simply making it easier to gain access to department websites.

"I think the fact that there's a majority will allow him some breathing room that isn't just focused on the political side," says Anne Game, executive director of Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE), in the wake of a report by her organization that gives the government a failing grade for its lack of openness.

Game strikes a hopeful tone that belies the conclusions her organization reached about the Harper government and its attitude towards access to information. For the second year in a row, the CJFE graded the government's commitment to, among other things, access to information.

And for the second year in a row, the government failed, this time an earning an F-minus.

"Unfortunately, the problem isn't isolated to the court system, or even to the province," the report notes. "Despite the promises laid out by the Access to Information Act, getting information out of any number of government bodies... is neither straightforward nor timely."

To reach this conclusion, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression collected information from a number of sources, including the Information Commissioner and journalists such as yours truly.

In this space, I have chronicled the difficulty journalists have had obtaining information, and noted that this difficulty may be contributing to a disturbing trend: fewer journalists are using the Act.

What's surprising about CJFE's recent report is that it's worse than the 2009 report card that gave the government an F due to problems that have become all too familiar, including significant delays in responding to requests and refusals to release anything at all.

"We remain bedeviled," the report concluded, "by the antics of those federal entities that invoke national security at the drop of a hat to restrict the dissemination of vital information to journalists and, in turn, the public."

Anne Game says her group has collected enough information to reach some disturbing conclusions that constitute "a warning" about the government's commitment to access to information.

Then why is she also sounding an optimistic note?

Well, this takes us back to my initial observations. She feels that hoarding information made it easier to govern for a Prime Minister who hates "surprises." Keeping email correspondence, reports and briefing notes under lock and key meant there would be no politically embarrassing stories, or at least the number of them would be kept to a minimum.

Delaying the release of information until after a crisis had passed meant minimizing the potential for political damage, and, therefore, depriving political adversaries bent on forcing an election of any ammunition.

To be fair, Liberal prime ministers also controlled information, even when they had majorities.

Jean Chretien even shut down an inquiry into the Somalia affair in the mid-'90s, a time during which the department of National Defence became infamous for finding ingenious ways to impede the flow of information.

But things are different now. Stephen Harper has his long-coveted "stable, majority government." And he did once promise to run a government more open than that of any Liberal administration. Political observers surmise not having to worry about elections means Harper can govern in a less combative and less partisan way, which, from an information standpoint, could mean allowing his ministers more latitude to talk to reporters, which would send a signal to federal bureaucrats that it's okay to do the same.

And, more importantly, sending a signal to the senior mandarins to err on the side of making information public, something that the information commission has been pleading with the government to do. If Harper is more receptive to the recommendations of Suzanne Legault and the information commissioners who occupied the post in previous years, perhaps he will instruct his justice minister to amend the law and open up access.

Opening up government is not just an esoteric conversation for people inside the Parliamentary precinct, or the bubble that is Ottawa. If there's one lesson we learned from this past election it is that it is possible for people, especially a new generation of voters, to be engaged. The government needs such engagement if it's going to make important decisions about big-ticket items such as the environment, the economy, justice and health care. People need information in order to become knowledgeable about these issues and hold their leaders accountable.

So let's hope that Anne Game from Canadian Journalists for Free Expression is right to turn two negative report cards into a clarion call for something better. If she's right, the government will not only score higher on the next report card, but citizens, experts and politicians will be better positioned to have a real dialogue, based on real information about the issues that polls tell us Canadians care about.

Now wouldn't that be a legacy for any prime minister to be proud of?

David McKie can be reached at mailto:david_mckie@cbc.ca

Tags: access to information, accountability, conservatives, david mckie, stephen harper

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

WE SHOULD OPEN OUR EYES








Failing grade for government on information access

Journalists group also finds G20 summit an 'abject failure' of freedom of expression

Posted: May 10, 2011 11:44 AM ET

Last Updated: May 10, 2011 12:47 PM ET

Beginning of Story Content

When it comes to access to information, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government has received a failing grade, says a new report that also urges Canadians to remain vigilant on their freedom of expression.
For the second year running, the report by the Canadian Journalists for Free Expression has given the government an F minus, saying delays in the release of information lengthened and what was eventually released was less complete than before.
The report, titled "Like Sheep to the Slaughter," points to a Public Works bureaucrat's move to "unrelease" information to The Canadian Press as an example of why Canada now ranks last among five leading democracies when it comes to access to information.
"More than half of the federal institutions surveyed for their performance on access to information ranked below average and five failed outright. The governing party was ruled in contempt of Parliament for failing to produce information about major spending programs," the report states. "All of which may explain why journalists seem to be using the access system less often than in the past."
Statistics in the report say 44 per cent of federal access to information requests aren't met within the required 30-day limit, while it takes an average of 395 days to resolve an ATI complaint.

G20 summit 'abject failure' of free expression

The review also gives an F to security forces and the federal government for calling last summer's G20 Summit in Toronto an "unmitigated success" when the CJFE considered the event where thousands were detained the "most massive compromise of civil liberties in Canadian history."
"The Orwellian concept of creating a 'freedom of expression zone' during the summit set the tone for a long list of violations of that freedom, from refusal to recognize legitimate journalistic credentials to detention of journalists without due process or cause," the report said. "It was not a success but an abject failure."
CJFE board member and journalist Bob Carty said the most important message the report was trying to send is the need for Canadians to remain vigilant on freedom of expression.
"We shouldn't be complacent about our free expression rights here in Canada," said Carty, who was also one of the authors contributing to the 40-page-report.
"The structural problem of access to information on the one hand and the spontaneous events of the G20 summit show areas where we have to be very vigilant."

Other institutions graded

The Supreme Court of Canada received a C grade and a mixed review for its decision to force one journalist to turn over his source material while also recognizing the right to protect sources exists if the media can show it is in the public interest.
Despite the bleak overall showing, the CJFE is hoping the stability of a Conservative majority government will cause Prime Minister Harper to make some positive changes when it comes to access to information and freedom of expression issues.
"There's an opportunity right now for the Harper government to do the right thing to make this a more accessible government," said Carty. "We will be watching the Harper government's performance in deeds not words."
The one area to receive an above-average grade was the Office of the Information Commissioner, with Suzanne Legault given an A minus.
The CJFE notes the office continues to suffer from a lack of power to force disclosures and a weak access law they say is in need of reform. But it also said Legault "is a promoter of open government who shows a willingness to push the boundaries of her limited powers to produce greater access."
The report also recognized retiring House of Commons speaker Peter Milliken for helping to advance free expression rights. It pointed in particular to his "thoughtful, judicious and wise" ruling that found the previous Conservative minority government in contempt of Parliament for failing to release information on the cost of major new programs.
The report is only the CJFE's second one. It plans to expand the categories it evaluates in the future but also continues to sound a cautionary message to all Canadians.
"There is reason for concern," said Carty. "If we drop our guard we better be very careful about where our country and democracy is going."